Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Question of the day....?


Stalker discussion at lunch with Giggler and Evil Genius prompted this.....

Is it better to have a bad stalker than no stalker at all?

Discuss.......

22 comments:

  1. Ha! Funny question. I'm going to go with it's better to have no stalker at all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Having experienced a stalker, it is much better to have NO STALKER!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yikes! I vote for NO STALKER! Having a stalker would freak me out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When you say "bad" stalker, do you mean that they are bad at stalking? Having never had a stalker, good or bad, I still agree with the consensus, just say NO to stalking.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Are you talking blog stalker or real life stalker?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Definitely no stalker at all. I can't take the heat.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I had a little bit of a stalker at one point and found it really annoying. I am going with no stalker. Is there such a thing as a good stalker?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Uh...I would say no stalker, if a bad stalker is one peaks into your bedroom windows, follows you to the DTD, and drunk dials you at midnight.
    But, I wouldn't mind a little mild stalking...just to know I still got it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. is the stalker offering me diet Coke or chocolate?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I actually had a bonafide stalker. Trust me. You don't want a stalker at all. It is horrible.

    Granted, mine was some love sick maniac that thought I was his forever after I served him drinks at a bar as a young waitress of 21. That was many years ago where they didn't have stalker laws.

    The girl he stalked before me he almost killed in Texas. He obviously was on the run. He was in another state (VA) when he stalked me. To say that it was terrifying is a serious understatement.

    He is still in prison in Texas for attempted murder and aggrevated malicious wounding.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think stalkers are rather annoying.

    ReplyDelete
  12. As someone who has an unwanted stalker, I am going to say No Stalker at All.

    ReplyDelete
  13. No Stalkers. Thank you very much.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Umm- NO stalker at all. Funny they came up with that!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I would say not!

    I did have a secret admirer once when working at Nordstrom as a personal shopper. He knew where I lived, how many kids I had, what I drove. He wrote me notes unsigned...kinda freaky.

    ReplyDelete
  16. no stalker at all. although i wouldn't mind a "good stalker" in my life right now. keeps things interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Well, define "bad". If he's, you know, "evil" then I'd probably opt for "no stalker".

    But if he's just really bad at it, like he doesn't call me or follow me around or write love poems in chicken blood on my windshield, then where's the problem?

    Heck, we could all have bad stalkers right this second and not even know it!

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think it depends on the creep-factor. I had/have a blog stalker (I assume we're talking about blog stalkers?) and at first it was cool. Flattering. Fun to see what they wrote. But then it got kind of creepy. Inappropriate. Crossed some lines. Now it just gives me the creeps. EW.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Haven't had a stalker yet, so I have nothing to compare with...
    the closest thing was that some guy 'followed' my blog, and his profile picture was a naked guy - from the VERy low waist, so you couldn't see anything, but just BArely - but I just blocked him. No drama there. Kind of freaked me out for a minute, though.
    :~D

    ReplyDelete
  20. I've had a bad stalker before, and it was a little scary. But harmless stalkers are kinda fun. Jake has had a few silly stalkers which makes life a little more entertaining around here. :)

    ReplyDelete

Lay it on me....